Description
An enduring faction that aims to advance a philosophical view through the control of government.
Motivation and Discussion
Power and disagreement lead readily to the emergence of factions within social and political groups. Factions form when there is an opportunity for mutual benefit and support. Within large social groups of approximate peers, the personal relationships between individuals become less important than abstract ideals, and some factions formalise into organisations for controlling government, political parties.
A party philosophy need not be particularly complex, coherent or systematic. It is more often a smear of related ideas about government and society. At its simplest, and weakest, it can be little more than a mutual interest in power. Within a party, tensions often arise from the dual aims of advancing a view and controlling government. Policies change rapidly over time, to accommodate settled policy arguments, and so a party may continue to influence government. Philosophies also change, more slowly, over time.
Parties have constituencies, fluid powerbases that provide members and support.
Members and candidates for government agree to follow the party philosophy in return for resources and sponsorship. The wider party membership either believe in or find it useful to support the party philosophy. Those members in or close to government, agree to (largely) argue as an individual within the party, but then represent the collective decision to those outside.
Without a large social group of approximate peers the benefits for joining a party become fewer. The powerful individual has less need for a broad collective support base, and the powerless individual has more need for patronage from powerful individuals.
As social groups appointing government officials grow in size, it becomes harder to make decisions based on knowing the individuals concerned, and the advantages of a appointing an entire team at once grow. Parties, having advantages of scale, in branding and resource provision, therefore increase their influence.
Examples
Institutions which regulate political power on the basis of allocating it to individuals in broadly equivalent amounts, such as Parliaments or Voting, promote the emergence of Parties. The conditions of scale mentioned above mean parties in today's representative democracies are effectively gatekeepers to high or even fairly junior office in government. Party labels also obscure those politicians and officials that simply strive for just and competent government rather than a broader ideological agenda.
Parties in one-party states obviously also function as gatekeepers; in this case the part and the government become almost synonymous.
Proponents of philosophical schools of thought in ancient Greece, and afterwards, certainly attempted to influence government but were so disorganised and individualistic as to barely qualify as a party. Most of the philosophical schools in China of the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods were similarly disorganised. A possible exception is the Legalists, whose program of focusing on agriculture and war, a strictly consistent legal system of brutal collective punishment, and aggressive territorial expansion, established the framework for the first unification of China.
The Guelphs were a party supporting the Papacy against the Holy Roman Empire in 12th and 13th century Europe, particularly northern Italy. Over time they came to represent a more general resistance to German influence. The Guelphs split at the end of the 13th century into Black Guelphs and White Guelphs.
The British Conservative Party is, historically, one of the most electorally successful parties in the world. It originated in the 17th century to defend the interests of the Crown and landed aristocrats against the English parliament. Today it attempts to defend the commercial interests of individuals against the British and European parliaments, and a certain continuum can be seen between the two philosophies. During that period policy positions have changed rather more radically; the party that fiercely defended the Corn Laws and the British Empire now promotes free trade and resists the European Union.
The Democratic Party of the United States, though technically tracing its roots to the anti-federalist Republican party of Thomas Jefferson, is more a product of that party's split in the 1820s, engineered by Andrew Jackson. It defended the interests of white farmers, largely in southern states, promoting aggressively nationalist policies, expansion of slavery and distrust of mercantile banking and finance interests. The modern party retains its suspicion of industrial capitalism and its fondness for regulating labor, but is otherwise a party of the metropolitan middle class, largely in northern states, promoting multilateralism and multiculturalism.
The National Socialist German Workers Party (Nazi Party) was founded in 1921. It promoted strong central government, cultural unity, aggressive military expansion and the organisation of society along racial and eugenic lines, including the extermination of people deemed to be of undesirable races. The Nazi Party was abolished by the Allies at the end of World War II, though small and less popular parties have since echoed its ideas.
The Chinese Communist Party was founded in 1921 to promote the interests of workers and peasants, and overthrow the existing class system in order to remake it along Marxist lines. The initial successes of the party were won by rallying the support of an impoverished peasantry through land reform rather than following the Marxist template of proletarian revolution. Similarly, China's economic success over recent decades has been achieved by dismantling the command economy constructed by the CCP after 1950. The party's current philosophy appears to be promoting a strong, nationalist and unified China, while maintaining the party's monopoly on force and political speech.
It can be argued that the advent of cheap guns and explosives, by flattening the difference in power between individuals, helped establish the environment of mass politics in which political parties flourish.
Related patterns
Parliament, Voting
Comments
Suffrage
Voting Role patterns
Court
Executive
Figurehead
Party
Review Appointment patterns
Election
Examination
Interview
Sortition (Lottery) And as the art of well building, is derived from principles of reason, observed by industrious men, that had long studied the nature of materials, and the divers effects of figure, and proportion, long after mankind began (though poorly) to build: so, long time after men have begun to constitute commonwealths, imperfect, and apt to relapse into disorder, there may, principles of reason be found out, by industrious meditation, to make their constitution (excepting by external violence) everlasting.
-- Hobbes, Leviathan All acts of building are governed by a pattern language of some sort, and the patterns in the world are there, entirely because they are created by the pattern languages which people use.
-- Alexander, The Timeless Way Of Building
The Liberal Party of Menzies apparently was described as being a broad church and dissenting views were tolerated. It is interesting to see how a Right putsch is changing the party since Howard became PM. The Wentworth saga was interesting to watch, among other instances of the right gunning for dominance.
The Right factions are perhaps also changing the way the ALP works - witness the bunfight about branch stacking in Victoria last weekend.
Perhaps this also shows how the two main parties are converging, and should there be a real alternative you could expect these two percieved antagonists to swap preferences quick smart.
The ALP wooing the Greens could be touted as a counter example, but the Greens are not quite what they make themselves out to be either, in my opinion anyway.
I think that the right of the two main parties now are not interested in keeping our liberal democratic traditions.
Description An organisation for advancing a philosophical view through the control of government. Motivation and Discussion Power and disagreement lead readily to the emergence of factions within social and political groups. Factions form when there is a concordance of philosophical agreement and mutual benefit and support. Within large social groups of approximate peers, these formalise into organisations for controlling government, political parties.
Also added:
At its simplest, and weakest, it can be little more than a mutual interest in power. and the Guelph bit. Seriously, thanks for the feedback, all.