Kevin Rudd is the technocratic Australian Shadow Foreign Minister.
I grew up on a farm and my father said to me when I was about 10 -"Kev have you made up your mind what you are going to do in life?". Which to a 10-year old is a fairly confronting question.

"There are two great choices that you face". I said Dad what are they? He said "Is it going to be beef or is it going to be dairy?" China struck me as the third way.

ABC interview, July

In this forthcoming election foreign policy is the most substantial policy difference between the major parties. The ALP opposed involvment in Iraq, saying it was extralegal and a distraction from the War on Terror and the region.  Kevin Rudd was often the mouthpiece of that dissent. He's an unusually well qualified foreign policy spokesman, a former diplomat and fluent speaker of Chinese.

As his retro 2001 homepage outlines, Rudd grew up around Eumundi and Nambour, then excelled at ANU with first class honours in Chinese Language and History. He then joined the diplomatic service and served in Stockholm and Beijing. In a career path more reminiscent of Washington than Westminster, he left the civil service for Queensland state politics in 1988. As Queensland ALP Chief of Staff he helped to kick the stagnant and corrupt Nationals out of power. Rudd entered federal parliament in 1998, becoming Shadow Foreign Minister in 2001.

The interviews and articles online support the public persona that career path implies - a China wonk and Third Way left-winger, a regionalist used to maintaining a strict party line, and a gifted student with a touch of the arrogance of one used being at the top of the class.

That kind of scholastic erudition is often cut off at the knees in Australian public life, and earned him the caucus nickname Harry Potter. Nevertheless, he sensibly ignored quiet gripes he was a smart-arse and listened to President Hu Jintao's speeches to parliament without translation earphones. A touch of bragginess - mentions of his friends in Beijing - leaks through in the interviews. The average Australian will punish him for this if it's not under control - though current Foreign Minister and ex-diplomat Alexander Downer is pretty self-satisfied too. As was Gareth Evans, for that matter - perhaps it comes with the territory.

There are a few longer speeches available online. An broader address from 2001 starts by paying homage to ALP royalty.

Somewhere in the archives of the Department of Foreign Affairs lies a starry eyed letter from an equally starry eyed fourteen year old from deep within the Queensland veldt asking the Department's Minister how one went about becoming an Australian diplomat. The news had not reached Queensland in those days, or at least my part of it, that Gough in addition to being Prime Minister of the Commonwealth, was also, for a season its Foreign Minister. So back the letter came, signed by the great man himself, (I held it up to the light each morning to make sure of that) advising that is was probably a good thing that I went to University first and, having graduated, that I then write a letter of application.

The ABC interview quoted is unusually wide-ranging and informative. This is one of the stronger statements of One China I remember from an Australian politician:

it's been great to see Taiwan become a modern economy with rapidly and radically improved living standards for its 23 million people, when it comes to a formal declaration of independence of steps in that direction ... we do not think it is, good for the people of Taiwan, good for the people on the mainland or good for this region, including Australia, for that step to be taken when a high risk of the consequence of it would be war within our region.

...

[W]e are bound by the terms of our treaty of recognition of the PRC in 1972, which explicitly accepted Taiwan as a province of China.

This dismays foreign policy idealists, and seems indicative of the cautious line Labor would take with Indonesia or Myanmar. The focus on legality is at least philosophically consistent, and a theme he returns to.

One of the reasons I've been concerned about the Iraq war is that I get worried about the United States and John Winston Howard here at home thinking it is very clever and very smart to thumb your nose at the United Nations and the United Nations Security Council, the U.N Charter. Whatever the imperfections at least it is a bunch of rules which the world community put together half a century ago - and some rules are better than none.

This is also within a Labour foreign policy tradition going back at least to Doc Evatt, who helped build the UN. He mentions it explicitly in an interview with institution Laurie Oakes

if you're in any capital in the region from Jakarta to Beijing to Tokyo, one of the first names they bring up is Prime Minister Paul Keating - how is he, what's he doing, and they recall fondly his initiative in bringing APEC to the fore and taking Australia robustly into the region

Other interviews include on SBS and in grubby attack-dog mode on Seven.

The best politicians and writers enter the career after having a real job. As an ex-diplomat, Rudd skirts close to the line, but he certainly has an air of competence unusual in a Shadow without ministerial experience. We'll soon enough see if that competence is needed in a more serious task than haranguing from the opposition benches.

More reading: Tags, Kevin Rudd, China
Cam Riley: South Sea Republic. Freedom, liberty, equity and an Australian Republic.

Comments

  • Hey cam: This is a little more party political and mainstream than your usual fare, but I tried to keep the daily point-scoring out of it and it still seemed relevant.  If it doesn\'t fit SSR I\'ll withdraw it or you can no doubt dump it yourself.
  • cam . # .
    Looks fine to me: If I wanted it to be my view and my view only I would have deployed this on MovableType. I am hoping (fingers crossed) it gets a k5 like culture of article diversity.

    cam
  • cam . # .
    btw: We have twelve users and it needs for votes to get out of the queue.

    cam
  • cam . # .
    Foreign Policy: Foreign Policy is about the largest difference between Labor and Liberal. Both parties are economicly liberal (or rationalist), and their domestic policies seem to be predicated around electoral bribes. Foreign Policy is about the only place I can see where there is alternate worldviews between the parties.

    I like Labor\'s foreign policy, and have utter disdain for the Liberals \"great and powerful friends\" doctrine as I do not believe it is befitting an independent and aspirational nation. Any student of history will be able to tell proponents of the \"great and powerful friends\" doctrine that it has not worked once in a century. There is a tonne of empirical data for it to be dropped.

    However I dont think East Timor would have been possible under a Labor government. I consider East Timor the highlight of Howard\'s years. History will not remember him kindly for all his other messes, but East Timor was a good thing. It got a monkey off the Australian collective conscience. A cancer that has sat there since Australia did nothing when Fraser was told Indonesia invaded East Timor. To make it worse, our \"great and powerful friends\" of the time, Ford and Kissinger, gave Suharto the ok; only ramming home how useless the \"great and powerful friends\" doctrine is.

    The foreign policy issue of the last five years has become terrorism, which has globalised along with multi-national corporations and trade. Locally, the terrorist threat to Australia is with extremists in Indonesia. So far it has been Indonesia that has been taking the punches for us, and handling it brilliantly, belying just how new their democracy is.

    This reality fits closely with Labor\'s policy of \"Asian Engagement\", \"Security Within Asia, not from it\". Close ties between Australia and Indonesia are going to be necessary to combat terrorism and disorder regionally. Australian national security will become dependant on it. Labor will be able to achieve this better than the Liberals simply because of the different foreign policies. Indonesia, and hence local terrorism will become Labor\'s focus.

    Foreign Policy wise, the Labor view of terrorism and the steps that can be taken to eradicate it, are far more enlightened than Liberals old \"Cold War\" policies. Iraq has shown that the military is a blunt instrument with no finesse when it comes to terrorism. Tanks dont stop terrorism, they just create the environment that terrorists thrive in. Howard should be censured for Iraq. It was a vacuous decision that displays how beholden to US interests he is, and how divorced he is from the polity and the realities of south pacific region.

    I consider Evans and Keating Australia\'s first two modern politicians. Ones that broke the mould of 90 years of post-colonial Australian political thought. If Rudd can continue that process, which it appears he may, then it will be a good thing for Australia.

    cam
  • Bootstrapping: Good luck with the site, hope it does well.
  • cam . # .
    No worries: btw I am impressed with myself for putting a boomerang as the foreign policy icon.

    cam
  • The compulsions of geography: In some ways Australia\'s short history has been one long brave effort to completely ignore geography.  From the initial strategic overextension of the British Empire; the insuitability of European agriculture; all the way to involvement in yet another ground war in the Middle East.  Impressive we\'ve got away with it so far really.

    So far it has been Indonesia that has been taking the punches for us, and handling it brilliantly, belying just how new their democracy is

    That would be the optimists view.  The pessimists view would be that Indonesians in high places were sufficiently sympathetic to related organisations that they looked for a legal avenue out.  I happen to agree with the position they took, and think it more consistent with the rule of law.  However the Indonesian judiciary has not been spectacularly independent in the past.  This might have just been a convenient alignment of interests.

    I might also add the Indonesians have been commendably diplomatic over Howard\'s very tardy use of their police force as a political football.

    The Indonesian election will be interesting.