This is an interesting development. I think you should consider putting this forward for the next Missing Link.
Or Ken Parish might be interested in it. A lot of Australian constitutional law is based on english constitutional norms.
Jacques, I think it is going to reverberate into Australia because both Au and the UK practice Westminster so closely. Many of the reforms Brown is advocating are directly translatable so I expect it will cause focus on Australian constitutional practice.
'Sworn to no party, and of no sect am I.' Frederick Vosper's republican motto.
But there is a firewall between UK and Australian practice called The Constitution of Australia; the more applicable changes that Brown is discussing would have to go through a referendum, no?
Australia (especially the states) has a habit of passing constitutional practice in legislation. For instance the Federal AG having to consult with the state AGs before appointing a High Court judge is in a statutory act. So a lot of these practices can be put into legislation. It means a future government can blast them away if they want, which they cant with a constitution, but it could be done now that way.
'Sworn to no party, and of no sect am I.' Frederick Vosper's republican motto.
Comments