Specialism: Abundance isnt to remove the specialist, nor diminish their role, but instead to remove the barriers of entry to becoming a specialist, and also stopping their entrenchment once they become reach a position of specialism.
Kind of like the news cycle, it flits from subject to subject and gives big opinions on all. But the news cycle has static commentators, and doesnt incorporate flocking specialism in their process to any degree.
The closest would be the talking head shows, like 7.30 Report which gets several specialists on that subject. Then again in the US you have celebrity driven talking head shows with a static groups of specialists who talk on subjects they have no knowledge about.
It isnt specialism that is bad, but lack of generalism in that case. Or in other words a lack of subject to subject specialism. the celebrity specialists have become static, and their authority and legitimacy assumed as being pertinent to \"all\" subjects.
I wandered ...
cam
Comments