Practicality writes an article exposing the stupid morass of over-regulation that dominates Australia state and federal government. One of the principles of republicanism is that spontaneous self-organization is superior to government regulation - the latter being far too coarse and often political to take in the local context or be as good as the judgement of an individual in any situation. There are areas where government regulation has a place, but for most purposes it carries the burden of inefficiency.
The main determinants of driving speed were considered to be the weather conditions, the speed of other vehicles, the volume of traffic and the amount of time available to reach one's destination.While the government is enforcing speed limits left-right-and-centre, drivers are making up their own minds what is sensible driving for the conditions. Government will never have any legitimacy in this area unless they match the reality of how people drive. So what should government policy be? First remove all fixed forms of observation such as speeding cameras and red-light cameras. They are repugnant to liberty and do not solve the issue of safe driving. They cause more turbulence in the traffic flow than good and no-one considers them legitimate. Secondly set the speed limit to the 85th percentile of traffic and reduce the number of speed limit signs to a couple. Further, let the police use their judgement of who is driving unsafely and who is not. It will mean some police will abuse this trust, just as some drivers will abuse the grey area of enforcement, however we put up with these people in other aspects of life and they can be dealt with by firing or in the courts when they whinge their guts out. We can accept some inefficiencies in this area to ensure greater efficiency in terms of traffic flow. Thirdly: improve the roads. Connect the major cities at the very least with dual-carriageways that are 21st century road technology - like decent asphalt. (reply)
